Tag Archives: Paul Nash

A life in paints

Two unexpected coincidences. I read a beautiful memoir by Stefan Hertmans, War and Turpentine and then visited Tate Britain to see the new exhibition of paintings by Paul Nash.

war-and-turpentineThe book is a memory of his grandfather, a man that always seemed to be painting copies of the great masters. Shortly before his death Urbain gives his grandson a set of notebooks, though it is many years before he actually reads them.

They are the notebooks that describe in accurate and appalling detail his war service in Belgium during World War 1. Slowly a picture emerges of a young man, fighting a hopeless, chaotic and bloody war against a stronger and more ruthless enemy. Such actions that Urbain witnessed were unparalleled in savagery, such that he could not mention them again. So he painted, again and again simple, peaceful landscapes, mostly devoid of people, or many and detailed copies of famous grand masters, Rembrandt, Velásquez and others.

Hertmans, once he gets around to looking at the notebooks, begins to uncover a life filled with loss, horror and sadness, but it is through discovering this that he finally begins to understand his grandfather.

He comes upon him one day, weeping over a copy of Diego VelásquezThe Toilet of Venus [more commonly called The Rokeby Venus now in the National Gallery]. What was it about this particular painting that could evoke a memory so painful that a grown man should weep? Towards the end of his journey through his grandfather’s life, looking again, finally – properly – at his paintings, he sees something that reveals the man.

This book is a tour de force, the slow and steady accumulation of knowledge, as the author physically traces the steps of his grandfather, taking stock of places named in the notebooks, going to the places and looking, trying to imagine what his grandfather saw, probably through the target lens of a rifle or his binoculars, brings him to a place where he begins to understand the warrior, but it is something quite other that draws him towards the appreciation of the man.

This discovery also reveals the nature of his grandparents marriage, how it came about and its consequences, both for his grandparents and for his family.

A telling, subtle and rewarding book. A look into the past, seen through the lens of the gun and of the painter, a painter who never in all his life painted a single picture of the war.

nashThe exhibition at Tate Britain similarly tells the story of a painter, starting from his 20’s and passing through all the stages of his painting and development through to the final year of his life.

Paul Nash developed different styles of painting, from exquisitely detailed pieces in monochrome, showing a sensitive artistry and graphic skill, wood engravings, calligraphy and book illustration, (poetry even) right through British Surrealism and Expressionism to abstraction and finally back to landscape.

In all this, Nash changed styles, media and colour. His early works, often including trees and birds showed a definite mind-set, were frequently monochromatic and often studies of the same view, accurately, stylised or abstracted. At the bottom of some fields near his family home, for example, there were three elm trees. These appear often, sometimes in daylight, more often in moonlight, occasionally in silhouette, vastly out of scale with the landscape in which they are placed. All the more poignant because they have virtually disappeared from the English landscape.

This period was interrupted by the First World War. Paul Nash joined the Artists’ Rifles. He was in active service on the front line trenches in France. Sadly, at a time when he was convalescing after an accident in which he broke a rib his battalion, stationed on Hill 60, received a devastating and fatal attack and nearly everyone was killed. Nash’s paintings of that time, some of them the best known of all his work, were made later on and were a memorial to his lost comrades.   Paintings of the view from the trench, blasted trees standing in a sea of mud, and views of the trench showing soldiers on duty, many of these pictures show no man’s land at night, lit by flares and starlight in eerie and horrible ghastliness. A single monochrome work, shows unusually, the aftermath of the bombardment with dead bodies, barbed wire and chaos.

From there he moved towards painting interiors, generally of places looking out from indoors. His style has altered once again, taking on a symbolic message, death lies in the garden; a huge tree stump with a naked billhook thrust into its heart was painted after the death of his father, and is simply called February. Trees in an orchard look as much like barbed wire defences as apple trees, stacks of chopped logs and a snake coiled around a fence represent both death and healing.

There are often other mirrorings, from his flat window in St Pancras, he mixes the supports in a pot plant (the plant itself is dead) with the back of an advertisement hoarding and the window frame, making the viewer step back to figure out what exactly is going on here.

His dabbles in abstraction, filling his canvases with objects, often mathematical or draughtsmen’s tools, strange perspectives.

His landscapes of Berkshire and Oxfordshire however, return more and more to the naturalistic, though there is often something uncannily like the world war landscapes in the placing of ponds and curving hills. But trees and birds abound.

His flirtation with Surrealism and Expressionism failed to move me, it seemed to be an experiment engaging the mind and not the heart, though they are some of his more favoured works.

The Second World War intervened and he joined the war effort as an official war artist, his age though, kept him in England. Here he was taken to places where Nazi planes had crashed, and he faithfully recorded these spectacular failures: a huge plane, nose-cone deep in Windsor Great Park, a downed bomber bellied in a corn field, and the most famous painting of all –  a graveyard of smashed bombers, looking for all the world like a furious ocean of waves, until you pick out the swastikas and black crosses on wings and tailfins. There is an accompanying video film of Paul Nash visiting this extraordinary place, where smashed planes were gathered in huge stacks.

Paintings of the Rye Marshes and Dymock were done when he was recovering from a nervous breakdown, the angular sea wall and the river bending towards the sea take on sinister and war-like appearance, mirroring once again his trench experiences in an earlier war.

After the war, Nash returned to Boar’s Hill, his house looked across to Brightwell Barrow. A view that he had first painted in 1912, calling it Wittenham Clumps, though this is a mis-nomer.

The final room in this exhibition shows about sixteen different paintings all of the same view, though you need to pay attention to see this, since he moves or eliminates various strategic trees, plants or visual clues.

Two of the most striking show the sight of the clump, a high hill with beech trees at its summit, in an eclipse. You see both the sun and the reddened moon floating above this familiar but not familiar landscape. Both painted in 1946, the year of his death.

The trees have grown since then and it is no longer possible to see exactly the view that Paul Nash painted, but you can visit the footpath near Castle Hill, Brightwell Barrow itself, though, is on private land.

 

 

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Culture, Modern History, Travel, Uncategorized

London – Before, During and After

Bombed LondonI have just bought this amazing atlas-sized volume of maps of London created by the London County Council during the Second World War. Compiled for Thames and Hudson by Laurence Ward and costing £48.00, it is a collection of street maps marked with colour to show bomb damage during the air raids of the Second World War. The coding goes from Total Destruction, through Damaged Beyond Repair all the way to Clearance Area, with two other codes indicating V-2 and V-1 Flying Bombs.

Why on earth is this interesting?

Two main reasons, both entirely personal: I am of an age when the London of my childhood was still badly damaged, whenever we came into town we would pass – on the way to the dentist (Wimpole Street), to the hairdresser (Ebury Street) and shopping (Oxford Street) and not to mention friends and relatives all over London – buildings with gaping wounds showing wallpaper, even sometimes the faded shadows where pictures had hung, fireplaces forever cold and all sprouting with new life, buddleia, evening primrose, forget-me-nots, bomb-site lilies (Rose-Bay Willowherb) and Michaelmas daisies.

For London children this was their playground. Where I live now there were many destroyed and partially damaged warehouses, a real adventure playground (seemingly for every taxi driver who ever deposits me to my home). Did we think about what went before? Of course not, we were children. Even standing in Edwardes Square where my grandmother had lived, she moved to Sussex to be safer just weeks before a bomb went straight through to the basement, left us baffled rather than shocked.

The second reason is that my mother drove the Chief Fire Brigade Officer around the city, during and after the raids. I am not sure if there was one or many, but she drove this one around the city, examining the damage and making recommendations for (and I think) bravery awards to some stations and finally visits to the widows of fire fighters who had lost their lives, which she remembers as the worst thing of all.

This Atlas is utterly colossal, full of maps and photographs and some text explaining the context and the way it was compiled. Apparently, they used the street maps that appeared many years earlier made by Charles Booth in which he mapped the poverty or affluence by colour, these appeared recently in a BBC documentary called The History of Our Streets.

Using the same system of colouring in each house you see the build up of damage from 1939 through to 1945, the mind bends at the industry, but also at the fortitude of the people who stayed put, either for their jobs or for lack of an alternative or simply out of determination not to be beaten. Truly it must have been terrifying.

NoondayI have also bought Pat Barker‘s final volume of the trilogy that started with Life Class.Life Class These novels followed the fortunes of mainly three people, Kit Neville, Paul Tarrant and Elinor Brooke (later Tarrant), they meet as the title suggests in the life classes of Professor Henry Tonks at the Slade School of Art. The trilogy takes them through youth and on to their First World War experience, largely covered in the second volume Toby’s Room Tobyand finally finishes off with Noonday which has only recently come out.

The three main protagonists cover the ground so to speak, first they are carefree students exploring life and their varying talents, then war come along and they get damaged physically or mentally and then there is a brief peace, where they re-group and pick up their shattered or sheltered lives and finally in Noonday they are back in the thick of the war, this time the Second World War.

For any one who has read A Crisis of Brilliance by David Boyd Haycock or A Terrible Beauty by Paul Gough or anything about Stanley Spencer this will be familiar territory. The gradual realisation that artists had something to contribute to the war, apart from fighting that is, and that this carried on into the Second World War in a much more organised manner is to some extent what this trilogy is about. Several artists including Elinor are recruited by Kenneth Clarke to paint but not, to his fury and chagrin, Kit Neville. In Noonday, Paul goes to an exhibition (now famous) of paintings of the war by official “war artisits” in the National Gallery, denuded of its treasures – there he sees Laura Knight, John Piper, Henry Moore et al.

This is Pat Barker in a slightly different territory to her Regeneration Trilogy, in that she imagined a fictional meeting and conversations between two real people, surrounded by a whole panoply of completely fictional but fully realised other characters. I don’t know what this new trilogy will come to be called, but here she has completely fictionalised the lives of some famous people, Dora Carrington, Charles Nevinson and Paul Nash and replaced them in a different context. I am not convinced it works, unless presumably you know nothing about the ‘real’ characters. In Noonday by far the most rounded character is Bertha, a grossly fat medium who benefits from the growing need to “channel” the dead.

Which is not to say that these are not very readable books, there are moments of captivating horror, sublime joy and beauty, it is just a pity that the inhabitants do not spring living from the page.

Leave a comment

Filed under Books, Culture, Environment, Modern History, uncategorised